One of the most common challenges of facilitation is transforming a diverse group of people into a cohesive team with a shared vision. We've been talking in this series about the power of focus. One method I often suggest to my clients for overcoming this challenge by using the power of focus is the Context Map.
In this post we'll:
- Define and describe the Context Map.
- Give some pointers on how to use it effectively.
- Talk about some side benefits I've realized from using it.
- Provide a link to a great example of a context map
The Context Map: What is it, anyway?
A context map is a graphic tool used to capture the group's understanding of external forces at work relative to the organization under discussion. I like to use the one by Grove because it allows me to display the big picture but focus on the individual parts in the exercise. I also like the way the template uses large, sweeping arrows to draw the eye toward the center of the diagram. They also provide a neat way to categorize the forces.
Some of the areas a context map captures are:
- Trends – economic, technology, regulatory, demographic
- Forces - competitive, market
- Factors – cultural, political
Context maps can also be adapted to many efforts aside from strategic visioning. For example, the Bredemeyer Architecture Method uses this as part of their Software Architecture process.
Tips and Pointers (no pun intended)
When using this map I like to work with the group to first identify some of the categories we will be exploring as part of the exercise. I make sure I use a red pen to label the different arrows so that the categories are consistent and easy to spot.
I then choose a place to start based on the interest of the group. Brainstorming begins at this point. I like to get them talking about the ideas they propose while I capture them on the template. Sometimes it is helpful to capture the name of the person offering the idea so that we can follow up later for further clarification.
I also find it very helpful to have at least one person taking notes on a laptop. They capture more detail than what I am able to write down on the template. It is helpful to have a word table already available on the laptops so the note taker can concentrate on filling in the cells with the comments.
This brings me to an important point. In every engagement I have done we have taken the time to capture all the information digitally and publish a book shortly after the session. This has immense value in making the session memorable and making sure the momentum continues after the event. The half-life of the excitement and enthusiasm for these kind of efforts is very short unless it is actively nurtured and fed after the fact. Publishing a book of the event not only increases the half-life, it provides good documentation to build on going forward.
To capture the information necessary to publish a book requires a fair amount of planning and preparation before the event.
- Templates need to be drawn or purchased before had.
- Word documents and templates need to be created. I like to create as much of the book as possible before the event.
- Supplies need to be purchased and assembled such as extra paper, very large post-it notes, pens that don't bleed through the paper.
- Plan to bring a digital camera to get pictures of all the flips charts and templates used.
Finally, all of the information on the template needs to be transferred to the word table and printed out for review by the team after a break. It is easy to spot holes and inconsistencies when viewing the information in table form. Doing this step will provide a much better end product.
What You Get Is More Than What You See
One of the most valuable benefits realized from this exercise is the unifying effect on the group being facilitated.
- They have created something together.
- Everyone sees the issues confronting the organization.
- They have all had an opportunity to discuss them with each other.
This effort alone goes a long way toward the change management effort that most of these efforts require for success.
Another valuable benefit you will realize from this exercise is having a solid basis for answering the question, "Why?"
- Why are we doing this project?
- Why should I care about this?
Answers to these questions provide one side of the business justification equation. Answer to these questions are what your project is all about.
The questions provide answers to challenges to the project such as, "What happens if we don't do this project?"
Yes, the effects of a good Context Mapping exercise can be felt throughout the life the project and beyond. Are you working on a project or effort that would benefit from a context mapping exercise? if you have used this in the past please give us your experiences and tips using the comment form below.
RESOURCES
In case you missed the link earlier in this post you can learn about the Context Map by Grove by clicking here.
The thing with the Context map is that you often don’t go deep enough. When I facilitate it with my clients I have to get them to do some homework on their competitors, (web sites, product introductions, etc) so that the Context Map becomes a rich view of their environment. Since it takes about a hour and a half to get the map filled up. . . .the Technical stuff in the bottom doesn’t get addresses real well, so sometimes I have them bring in an I.T. or manufacturing guy to make sure those considerations are given weight
The Political part of the context map also allows for some serious discussion about office politics and who has power and clout. It allows you to figure out who will be the obsticles to impliment the plan down the road.
I could go on but ought to keep this short.
Kordell Norton
(300) 405-1950
Kordell, I appreciate your comment here which really underscores the value of preparation. As I look back over the many times I have used this tool I realize from your comment how much more benefit we would have realized from better preparation.
Without preparation what you get is what is on the top of everyone’s mind. Things just come off the top of their heads or, as Kordell mentions, are just blank because the participants are not informed in that area.
It strikes me that some form of homework by the team needs to happen to make this as productive as possible. My experience with this is that it really depends on the team you are working with. The most successful sessions were with teams that were more research oriented, the least from teams that were more operations oriented.
Any other thoughts on how to pre-assess this activity to determine the right amount of preparation? I am also wondering what kind of preparation activities yield the best success?
A pivotal part of the preparation is giving careful consideration to the stakeholders we bring in to the Context Mapping session. This is a topic in of itself! But the quality of the outcome depends very much on
the participants. (Kordell is alluding to this when he mentions bringing in IT and manufacturing.)
I mean this not only in terms of the quality of the content of the Context Map, but also the quality of the state change it affects in the participants! A shared context helps create alignment.
Many thanks to Kordell and Ruth for their insightful comments. Yes, preparation is key to successful context mapping.
The most successful facilitators seem to have at least one characteristic in common: curiosity! They are always asking questions like: “I wonder who we need to invite?” “Who else needs to be here?” “Are all sides represented?”
I also like the point that not only do you get a better result, e.g. more and better information collected and documented, but it is the first step in change management. Involving key stakeholders early in the process is vital to a successful change management effort.
I just had the coolest thing happen. I created sales training using a visual process to force the sales people to gather in customer insights and information. I just finished teaching a conference of educators who have sales in their job titles and functions. The reviews were fantastic. I am really encouraged. For the first time we can use the visual process to completely revolutionize a new field. . .that of sales training. I guess I shouldn’t be surprized. I use it in making my sales calls and my closing rates are 80% plus . . . consistently.
Again. . . I kid you not. I had not only “rookie” sales people in these training events but also had extremely seasoned sales people with many decades of experience who went gaga for the process. It strongly encourged me to move ahead on finishing and publishing a book I have been writing on sales and graphic representation.
Kordell,
Congratulations on your recent success. It is amazing how much better we are able to communicate using visual methods. I have heard many similar stories from so many clients and readers!
I can’t wait to see your new book.
How about the reset of you? Any success stories you would like to share?
-Bill